# Check a batch before trusting the comparison

Source: https://judicio.ai/blogs/bulk-document-review-ai

Start with a representative set of agreements that includes an amendment, a scan and a deliberately missing schedule. Ask the same questions across the set. Keep a source-file manifest so an absent answer cannot silently become an assumed negative.

Matter identifier: ____________________
Jurisdiction / forum: ____________________
Reviewer / date: ____________________

- [ ] Confirm the expected file count and associate amendments with their base agreements.
- [ ] Check text readability and record documents that require better copies or manual review.
- [ ] Open the source for a sample of positive, negative and missing answers.
- [ ] Resolve contradictions and missing documents before summarising portfolio-level findings.
- [ ] Record the unresolved questions and the next review action.

| Source / page | Proposition or finding | Review decision | Outstanding check |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | |

Illustrative workflow aid. This is not a court form, legal advice or a record of measured product performance.